Deal or No Deal? Consensual Arrangements as an Instrument of European Competition Policy
Oliver Budzinski and
Kuchinke Björn A. ()
Additional contact information
Kuchinke Björn A.: Bauhaus-University Weimar, Media Economics, Albrecht-Dürer-Straße 2, D-99425 Weimar
Review of Economics, 2012, vol. 63, issue 3, 265-292
Abstract:
Roughly during the last decade, European Competition Policy has undergone a series of fundamental changes. All four areas - cartel policy, merger policy, abuse control, and state aid control - have been subject to a modernization process, which led to a focus on analysing the effects of individual cases and established a tendency towards deciding each case on its individual merits. These changes can be understood as a move away from rule-based competition policy towards a case-by-case approach. The case-by-case approach especially includes consensual arrangements, so-called ‘deals’ between the competition authority and business companies. Therefore, this paper will discuss the pros and cons of ‘deals’ as an instrument of (European) competition policy. The paper′s central focus lies on the economic analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of using consensual arrangements as a relevant instrument of European competition policy. With respect to European competition policy, we conclude that we need to issue a note of caution. From an economic perspective, an expansion of consensual elements necessarily walks hand in hand with a continual weakening of the protection of competition. Consumer welfare will not benefit from expanding the role and importance of consensual arrangements as a means of European competition policy.
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2012-0301 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
Working Paper: Deal or no deal? Consensual arrangements as an instrument of European competition policy (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:reveco:v:63:y:2012:i:3:p:265-292
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/roe/html
DOI: 10.1515/roe-2012-0301
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economics is currently edited by Michael Berlemann
More articles in Review of Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().