Testing for Welfare Comparisons when Populations Differ in Size

Jean-Yves Duclos and Agnes Zabsonre

Cahiers de recherche from CIRPEE

Abstract: Assessments of social welfare do not usually take into account population sizes. This can lead to serious social evaluation flaws, particularly in contexts in which policies can affect demographic growth. We develop in this paper a little-known though ethically attractive approach to correcting the flaws of traditional welfare analysis, an approach that is population-size sensitive and that is based on critical-level generalized utilitarianism (CLGU). Traditional CLGU is extended by considering arbitrary orders of welfare dominance and ranges of “poverty lines” and values for the “critical level” of how much a life must be minimally worth to contribute to social welfare. Simulation experiments briefly explore the normative relationship between population sizes and critical levels. We apply the methods to household level data to rank Canada’s social welfare across 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006 and to estimate normatively and statistically robust lower and upper bounds of critical levels over which these rankings can be made. The results show dominance of recent years over earlier ones, except when comparing 1986 and 1996. In general, therefore, we conclude that Canada’s social welfare has increased over the last 35 years in spite (or because) of a substantial increase in population size.

Keywords: CLGU; welfare dominance; FGT dominance; estimation of critical levels; welfare in Canada (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 D31 D63 I30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cirpee.org/fileadmin/documents/Cahiers_2010/CIRPEE10-39.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lvl:lacicr:1039

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de recherche from CIRPEE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Manuel Paradis ().