Analyzing the Pathway to Improve Tiger Conservation in India

Zareena Begum. I (zareena@mse.ac.in) and Amanat K. Gill (amanat@mse.ac.in)
Additional contact information
Zareena Begum. I: Madras School of Economics
Amanat K. Gill: Madras School of Economics
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Zareena Begum Irfan (zareena@mse.ac.in)

Working Papers from Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India

Abstract: Despite substantial conservation investments by governments and international agencies, the existence of tigers in the wild is still threatened. The main threats to the survival of wild tigers are poaching, prey depletion, and habitat degradation and fragmentation. All international trade in tiger parts has been prohibited since 1975, with China introducing a domestic ban in 1993. The domestic trade ban in China was followed by the establishment of captive tiger breeding farms in East Asia. China has considered partially lifting the trade ban to permit sales from tiger farms. This has been a matter of much debate with the proponents to the trade ban opposing it on the grounds that it result in an increase in the illegal killing of tigers and would also result in an increase in demand for tiger products, while the proponents to tiger farming favouring a supply side approach to conservation with products from tiger farms meeting all the demand. This research paper argues that it is possible to protect wild tigers by permitting the sale of products from tiger farms. India has mainly targeted tiger conservation with the establishment of tiger reserves all over the country, but this has resulted in the displacement of local communities from land that was traditionally belonged to them. Community based conservation seeks to conserve wildlife by giving local people a stake in its conservation and thus, providing an incentive to conserve it. This paper using a bio-economic model argues that giving local communities a stake in conservation of tigers like a share of tourism revenues aids conservation, as it would result in an increase in anti-poaching effort undertaken by the local communities, but this is contingent upon the additional revenue being higher than the cost of intrusion.

Keywords: Community; Domestication; Parameterization; Poaching; Wildlife Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C02 C69 Q26 Q29 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2014-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mse.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/working-paper-90.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mad:wpaper:2014-090

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geetha G (info@mse.ac.in).