How Economists Got It Wrong: A Nuanced Account

David Colander

Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper considers how economists failed society by not preparing society to expect and plan for a possible financial crisis. It argues that the story told by Paul Krugman in his recent NYT Magazine article was too black and white in that it made it look as if Classical economists who were blinded by the beauty of mathematics, are to blame and that Keynesian economics is the path of the future. This paper takes issue with both those claims. It reviews the evolution of economic thinking from Classical to modern times, and shows the Keynesian/Classical terminology misses many of the nuances of policy discussions. It suggests that the solution for the macroeconomics profession isn’t the solution that Krugman suggests it is—to re-embrace Keynes. The solution is to re-embrace the broader Classical economic tradition, and to recognize that Keynes was an important part of that Classical tradition.

Keywords: Keynes; Classical; Krugman; macroeconomics; crisis; depression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2009-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-hpe and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0909.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: HOW ECONOMISTS GOT IT WRONG: A NUANCED ACCOUNT (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0909

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vijaya Wunnava ().