Evaluating Affordable Housing Outcomes in Toronto: An Analysis of Density Bonusing Agreements

Julie Mah
Additional contact information
Julie Mah: University of Toronto

No 58, IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance

Abstract: Owing to limited public-sector funding, municipalities have increasingly relied on the private sector to help build affordable housing. Some cities have employed value capture tools – such as incentive zoning (which may involve density bonusing and other incentives) – to address housing affordability problems. These tools use the increase in land value that results from public actions (such as rezoning) to pay for affordable housing. In Toronto, the City has secured such affordable housing contributions largely through the development approvals process and individual negotiations with developers. This process has been facilitated through Section 37 of Ontario’s Planning Act, which permits the City to approve increases in height or density or both above the limits allowed by current zoning in exchange for community benefits. Very little research has examined how effective this density bonusing approach has been in producing affordable housing in Toronto. This paper examines Section 37 agreements from 1988 to 2018 that contain affordable housing benefits to show the housing outcomes achieved through Toronto’s approach. In November 2021, the City of Toronto adopted a new inclusionary zoning policy that requires developers to set aside a percentage of new housing units as affordable housing. So it is important to analyze Section 37 data and map where, how many, and what type of affordable units were produced under the previous affordable housing governance structure to create a baseline against which a future approach could be evaluated. The results of the analysis show that while Section 37 has managed to generate some physical affordable units, the tool has been more successful at securing funding (more than $65 million) for affordable housing. Unfortunately, these cash contributions translate into relatively few units. Moreover, the funds have been received in many small amounts over the years, further reducing the effectiveness of this approach to creating new affordable housing.

Keywords: : affordable housing; density bonusing; City of Toronto; inclusionary zoning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H70 R38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 31 pages
Date: 2022-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published online

Downloads: (external link)
https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/ ... ah_april_27_2022.pdf First version, 2022

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mfg:wpaper:58

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Enid Slack ().