Reforming Statutory Public Hearings for Planning
Aaron Moore and
Alexandra Caporale
Additional contact information
Alexandra Caporale: University of Toronto
No 66, IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance
Abstract:
This paper considers the continued relevance of statutorily required public hearings as effective forums for participation in planning in Canada, and whether provincial and municipal governments should seek to reform or remove them from the planning process. We examine the entire rezoning and amendment process in four cities: Toronto and Brampton in Ontario, and Vancouver and Surrey in British Columbia, by drawing on the findings of our earlier study (Moore and Caporale 2023) and an additional 27 interviews we conducted with stakeholders familiar with the respective planning processes. Based on our analysis, we find that statutory public hearings are a necessary part of the planning process, but in their current form are ineffectual forums for public participation. We suggest several reforms to address their current failings.
Keywords: urban planning; urban politics; Canada; public hearings; public consultation, public participation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: P11 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2024-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published online
Downloads: (external link)
https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/ ... ore_and_caporale.pdf First version, 2024
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mfg:wpaper:66
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Enid Slack ().