Addressing Attrition Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials: Considerations for Systematic Evidence Reviews

John Deke, Emily Sama-Miller and Alan Hershey

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: This report examines the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review's attrition standard and how its boundary responds to changes in two fundamental assumptions: (1) the correlation between outcomes and attrition, and (2) the level of attrition bias deemed acceptable.

Keywords: RCT; Randomized Controlled Trials; Systematic Evidence Reviews; HomVee; Home Visiting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21
Date: 2015-07-30
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/p ... _evidence_review.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/earlychildhood/rtc_systematic_evidence_review.pdf [302 Found]--> https://www.mathematica.org/System/404-page-not-found?ItemNotFound=true)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:182c57707b464906b26c77513a057508

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).