Patients and Clinicians as Stakeholders in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Multiple Perspectives and Evolving Roles

Sunyna S. Williams, Dominick Esposito and Eugene C. Rich

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: To improve health outcomes, clinicians and patients must have evidence-based information available to help them make informed decisions, the knowledge and skills to use this information, and positive attitudes about the value of using comparative effectiveness research (CER) in decision making.

Keywords: attitudes; clinician engagement; healthcare decision-making; knowledge; patient engagement; skills; stakeholder engagement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.61 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.61 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.61 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.61)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:4761dcf1a9af49fb8977e92be76de545

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).