Public Perceptions of Comparative Effectiveness Research and Use of Evidence in Healthcare Decision-Making

Derekh Cornwell, Mindy Hu and Dominick Esposito

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: The study examined public attitudes toward and understanding of comparative effective research (CER). Six focus groups were conducted with consumers in three major cities to examine the extent of familiarity and understanding of CER.

Keywords: activation; active; comparative effectiveness research; consumers; focus groups; passive; Public (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.63 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.63 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.63 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/cer.14.63)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:88beaa93c4424bd18399b746100dffe2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).