Assessing the "Rothstein Falsification Test": Does It Really Show Teacher Value-Added Models Are Biased?

Dan Goldhaber and Duncan Dunbar Chaplin

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: In an influential paper, Jesse Rothstein (2010) shows that standard value-added models (VAMs) suggest implausible and large future teacher effects on past student achievement.

Keywords: Value added; falsification tests; teacher evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19345747.2014.978059#.VLgo43Yo7q4 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19345747.2014.978059#.VLgo43Yo7q4 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19345747.2014.978059)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:93f34c834817419a9efccecdf9c28e0c

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).