How Does Value Added Compare to Student Growth Percentiles?

Elias Walsh and Eric Isenberg

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: We compare teacher evaluation scores from a typical value-added model to results from the Colorado Growth Model (CGM), which 16 states currently use or plan to use as a component of their teacher performance evaluations.

Keywords: Teacher effectiveness; Teacher evaluation; Teacher quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-04-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2330443X.2015.1034390 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2330443X.2015.1034390 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2330443X.2015.1034390)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:a7e93a7041c24e83bc6cdde57f6eeff6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).