Misdiagnosis: An Emerging Priority for Comparative Effectiveness Research

Eugene C. Rich

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: This article discusses the implications of diagnostic errors for comparative effectiveness research (CER). It notes the potential role of CER studies for improving diagnosis and treatment decisions and the value of expanding the CER agenda to address misdiagnosis.

Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness Research; Misdiagnosis; Methods Research; Health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 3
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/cer.13.68 (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/cer.13.68 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/cer.13.68 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/cer.13.68)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:f256f01a9640400aa167afbf046974c6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).