Theoretical Reductionism: Forcing a Covering Law Doctrine of Behavioral Psychology on the Sociology of Everyday Communication and Interaction

J Forbes Farmer

Journal of Social Science Studies, 2019, vol. 6, issue 1, 8-21

Abstract: This paper is an attempt to show that despite the stated differences in the explanations of interaction motives and rituals espoused by micro-sociologists, the major approach to the study of communication, language and social exchange is behavioral psychology. This includes the use of the covering law propositions of hedonism and cost-benefit analysis. With evidence from original writings, the author creates a Homansian assimilation of Goffman¡¯s dramaturgical analysis.

Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/13730 (application/pdf)
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/13730 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mth:jsss88:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:8-21

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Social Science Studies is currently edited by John Smith

More articles in Journal of Social Science Studies from Macrothink Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Technical Support Office ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).