EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Hometown wh?nau or big city millennials? The economic geography of graduate destination choices in New Zealand

Arthur Grimes, Shaan Badenhorst (), David Maré and Jacques Poot
Additional contact information
Shaan Badenhorst: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research

No 20_04, Working Papers from Motu Economic and Public Policy Research

Abstract: One of the main challenges facing non-metropolitan regions is the attraction and retention of highly-educated young people. A loss of the brightest can lead to reduced business creation, innovation, growth and community wellbeing in such regions. We use rich longitudinal microdata from New Zealand’s integrated administrative data infrastructure to analyse the determinants and geography of the choice of destination of tertiary educated (university and polytechnic) graduates. We address the question of post-student location choice in the context of the approach of Chen and Rosenthal (2008) who introduced a methodology for calculating ‘quality of life’ and ‘quality of business’ indicators for urban areas reflecting consumption and productive amenities respectively. Specifically, we test whether students – of different characteristics (e.g. institutional type and field of study) – locate in places that are regarded as good to live or good to do business. Our estimates are conditional on students’ prior school (home) location and the location of their higher education institution. We find that graduates are attracted to locate in places that have high quality production amenities. High quality consumption amenities have heterogeneous effects on the location choice of students. Creative Arts and Commerce graduates are relatively more likely to locate in places that are attractive to business, consistent with a symbiosis between bohemians and business. Places can leverage their existing (productive or consumption amenity) strengths to act as drawcards to recent graduates. The results are important for local decision-makers who wish to know which factors can attract and retain young qualified people.

Keywords: Innovation; Immigration; Local labour market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 J24 J61 R23 R58 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2020-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse, nep-edu, nep-int and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://motu-www.motu.org.nz/wpapers/20_04.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mtu:wpaper:20_04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maxine Watene ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:mtu:wpaper:20_04