The Institutional Determinants of Southern Secession

Mario Chacon and Jeffrey Jensen ()
Additional contact information
Jeffrey Jensen: Division of Social Science

No 20170001, Working Papers from New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science

Abstract: We use the Southern secession movement of 1860 to 1861 to study how elites in democracy enact their preferred policies. Most states used specially convened conventions to determine whether or not to secede from the Union. We argue that although the delegates of these conventions were popularly elected, the electoral rules favored slaveholders. Using an original dataset of representation in each convention, we first demonstrate that slave-intensive districts were systematically overrepresented. Slave-holders were also spatially concentrated and could thereby obtain local pluralities in favor of secession more easily. As a result of these electoral biases, less than 10% of the electorate was sufficient to elect a majority of delegates in four of the six original Confederate states. We also show how delegates representing slave-intensive counties were more likely to support secession. These factors explain the disproportionate influence of slaveholders during the crisis and why secessionists strategically chose conventions over statewide referenda.

Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2017-03, Revised 2017-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-his and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://nyuad.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyuad/academics/ ... papers/2017/0001.pdf First version, 2017 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nad:wpaper:20170001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alizeh Batra ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).