Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom

Jamie Murphy (), Frédérique Vallières, Richard P. Bentall, Mark Shevlin, Orla McBride, Todd K. Hartman, Ryan McKay, Kate Bennett, Liam Mason, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita, Anton P. Martinez, Thomas V. A. Stocks, Thanos Karatzias and Philip Hyland
Additional contact information
Jamie Murphy: Ulster University
Frédérique Vallières: Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin
Richard P. Bentall: University of Sheffield
Mark Shevlin: Ulster University
Orla McBride: Ulster University
Todd K. Hartman: University of Sheffield
Ryan McKay: University of London
Kate Bennett: University of Liverpool
Liam Mason: University College London
Jilly Gibson-Miller: University of Sheffield
Liat Levita: University of Sheffield
Anton P. Martinez: University of Sheffield
Thomas V. A. Stocks: University of Sheffield
Thanos Karatzias: Napier University
Philip Hyland: Maynooth University

Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Abstract Identifying and understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within distinct populations may aid future public health messaging. Using nationally representative data from the general adult populations of Ireland (N = 1041) and the United Kingdom (UK; N = 2025), we found that vaccine hesitancy/resistance was evident for 35% and 31% of these populations respectively. Vaccine hesitant/resistant respondents in Ireland and the UK differed on a number of sociodemographic and health-related variables but were similar across a broad array of psychological constructs. In both populations, those resistant to a COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to obtain information about the pandemic from traditional and authoritative sources and had similar levels of mistrust in these sources compared to vaccine accepting respondents. Given the geographical proximity and socio-economic similarity of the populations studied, it is not possible to generalize findings to other populations, however, the methodology employed here may be useful to those wishing to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy elsewhere.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (58)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20226-9 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-20226-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().