Quantifying previous SARS-CoV-2 infection through mixture modelling of antibody levels

C. Bottomley (), M. Otiende, S. Uyoga, K. Gallagher, E. W. Kagucia, A. O. Etyang, D. Mugo, J. Gitonga, H. Karanja, J. Nyagwange, I. M. O. Adetifa, A. Agweyu, D. J. Nokes, G. M. Warimwe and J. A. G. Scott
Additional contact information
C. Bottomley: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
M. Otiende: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
S. Uyoga: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
K. Gallagher: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
E. W. Kagucia: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
A. O. Etyang: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
D. Mugo: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
J. Gitonga: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
H. Karanja: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
J. Nyagwange: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
I. M. O. Adetifa: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
A. Agweyu: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
D. J. Nokes: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
G. M. Warimwe: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
J. A. G. Scott: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-7

Abstract: Abstract As countries decide on vaccination strategies and how to ease movement restrictions, estimating the proportion of the population previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 is important for predicting the future burden of COVID-19. This proportion is usually estimated from serosurvey data in two steps: first the proportion above a threshold antibody level is calculated, then the crude estimate is adjusted using external estimates of sensitivity and specificity. A drawback of this approach is that the PCR-confirmed cases used to estimate the sensitivity of the threshold may not be representative of cases in the wider population—e.g., they may be more recently infected and more severely symptomatic. Mixture modelling offers an alternative approach that does not require external data from PCR-confirmed cases. Here we illustrate the bias in the standard threshold-based approach by comparing both approaches using data from several Kenyan serosurveys. We show that the mixture model analysis produces estimates of previous infection that are often substantially higher than the standard threshold analysis.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26452-z Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26452-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26452-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().