Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal
Robert J. Brecha (),
Gaurav Ganti (),
Robin D. Lamboll,
Zebedee Nicholls,
Bill Hare,
Jared Lewis,
Malte Meinshausen,
Michiel Schaeffer,
Christopher J. Smith and
Matthew J. Gidden
Additional contact information
Robert J. Brecha: Climate Analytics
Gaurav Ganti: Climate Analytics
Robin D. Lamboll: Imperial College London
Zebedee Nicholls: The University of Melbourne
Bill Hare: Climate Analytics
Jared Lewis: The University of Melbourne
Malte Meinshausen: The University of Melbourne
Michiel Schaeffer: Climate Analytics
Christopher J. Smith: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Matthew J. Gidden: Climate Analytics
Nature Communications, 2022, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Scientifically rigorous guidance to policy makers on mitigation options for meeting the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal requires an evaluation of long-term global-warming implications of greenhouse gas emissions pathways. Here we employ a uniform and transparent methodology to evaluate Paris Agreement compatibility of influential institutional emission scenarios from the grey literature, including those from Shell, BP, and the International Energy Agency. We compare a selection of these scenarios analysed with this methodology to the Integrated Assessment Model scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. We harmonize emissions to a consistent base-year and account for all greenhouse gases and aerosol precursor emissions, ensuring a self-consistent comparison of climate variables. An evaluation of peak and end-of-century temperatures is made, with both being relevant to the Paris Agreement goal. Of the scenarios assessed, we find that only the IEA Net Zero 2050 scenario is aligned with the criteria for Paris Agreement consistency employed here. We investigate root causes for misalignment with these criteria based on the underlying energy system transformation.
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31734-1 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-31734-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().