EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Economic importance of the Belgian maritime and inland ports – Report 2020

Ilse Rubbrecht (ilse.rubbrecht@nbb.be)
Additional contact information
Ilse Rubbrecht: National Bank of Belgium

No 407, Working Paper Research from National Bank of Belgium

Abstract: In 2020, Belgian ports generated € 31.8 billion in direct and indirect value added (7% of Belgian GDP) and employed 254 611 full-time equivalents (FTEs) either directly or indirectly (5.9% of Belgian domestic employment including the self-employed). Despite the COVID-19 outbreak, direct employment at Belgian ports remained quite stable in 2020. The temporary lay-off system - more flexible during the pandemic - played a vital role in avoiding redundancies. Job losses in the port population were especially visible in the non-maritime cluster because the maritime activities were considered as essential and allowed to operate continuously. Direct value added at Belgian ports fell by 1.2% in 2020 against a drop of 4% for the whole of the Belgian economy. The drop was particularly visible in the non-maritime cluster more precisely in those branches hit by the temporary imposed closure of businesses or impacted by demand contractions and supplychain disruptions. In 2020, direct investment by all Belgian ports taken together rose by 5.1% to € 5.1 billion, thanks to higher sums invested in the chemicals industry and the cargo-handling sector. Analysing the investment degree levels by branch of activity, results indicate that shipping companies and port authorities invested relatively more given the competitive businesses in which they operate. A relatively high degree of investment is also notified for the energy sector and the industrial branches, whose operational activity is largely based on high technological knowledge and whose business is substantially subject to future developments. During the pandemic, total turnover figures fell. Downscaling costs to the same extend as declining sales was difficult given the presence of fixed costs, accordingly the profitability level of a median port company declined slowly. However, while strong performing1 port companies in terms of operating profit suffered a drop in profitability, weak performing businesses enhanced theirs owing to the generous government support measures. (In)direct support to wage and (para)fiscal payments endorsed port companies to maintain or even slightly strengthen their liquidity position, while their solvency was sustained as well.

Keywords: Belgian ports; microeconomic data; direct effects; indirect effects; input-output table; employment; value added; investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C43 C67 C81 J21 J49 L91 L92 R11 R15 R41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 122 pages
Date: 2022-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem and nep-tre
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/economic-importance ... nd-ports-report-2020 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbb:reswpp:202205-407

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Research from National Bank of Belgium Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (documentation@nbb.be).

 
Page updated 2024-12-25
Handle: RePEc:nbb:reswpp:202205-407