Time Scarcity and the Dual Career Household: Competing Perspectives

Bruce Philp and Dan Wheatley

NBS Discussion Papers in Economics from Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University

Abstract: Since 1997, until the present, UK Government policy has increasingly acknowledged the principle of work-life balance and problems of work-time excess. The present paper contributes to our understanding of these issues via a theoretically-informed longitudinal investigation of time-use among members of an increasingly important demographic group — dual career households. The seminal approaches to work-time offered by Gary Becker, Catherine Hakim, and David Laibman are outlined, then evaluated using data extracted from the 1996 and 2008 British Household Panel Survey. Our study identifies significant, unexplained dissatisfaction with working hours for many men and women in dual career households, and that women tend to have less pure consumption time than men. This pattern does not accord well with theories of time-allocation which place great weight on preferences.

Keywords: Work-Time; Household; Time-Use; Heterodox Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J22 O15 R23 R41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/3 ... career-household.pdf First version, 2010 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbs:wpaper:2010/6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBS Discussion Papers in Economics from Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by King Lim ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).