Reducing Legislative Polarization: Top-Two and Open Primaries Are Associated with More Moderate Legislators

Christian R. Grose

Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 2020, vol. 1, issue 2, 267-287

Abstract: Partisan polarization in Congress is at its highest levels in more than 100 years. Political reformers advocate for changes to electoral institutions in order to reduce legislative ideological extremity, yet political scientists have been surprisingly skeptical that changes to primary nomination systems affect legislator ideology. I theorize that electoral systems shape legislator ideology. The top-two primary — used in just under one-fifth of all U.S. House elections — incentivizes legislators to moderate. Empirically, I rely on exogenous changes in the introduction and withdrawal of the top-two primary due to ballot proposition or in response to court cases, and examine legislator ideological extremity from 2003 to 2018. The top-two primary has reduced ideological extremity among legislators, relative to those elected in closed primary systems. Legislators elected in open primaries also show some evidence of attenuated extremity. This ideological moderation in top-two and open primaries is found among both incumbents and newly elected legislators.

Keywords: Electoral institutions; open primaries; election administration; Congress; ideology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000012 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000012

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().