THE OEM-OBM DEBATE: FACTORS INFLUENCING CHINESE FIRMS' BRANDING DECISIONS IN THEIR INTERNATIONALISATION PROCESS
Ian Wilson ()
Additional contact information
Ian Wilson: Business School, Staffordshire University, England
Global Economic Observer, 2013, vol. 1, issue 2, 143-151
Abstract:
A key international marketing decision for many Chinese (and firms from other emerging markets) is whether to internationalise their own brands - labelled by the Chinese as OBM (Original or Own Brand Manufacturing) - or to be international players by acting as contract manufacturers (labelled by the Chinese as OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) for foreign brand owners (FBOs). The paper discusses some of the extant research on the advantages and disadvantages of each business model and then focuses on primary research conducted amongst 8 Chinese firms in electronics and textiles and the OEM-OBM decisions they face. In so doing, it discusses some of the factors influencing such decisions and proposes a framework for reviewing them as firm and environmental circumstances change.
Keywords: OEM; OBM; internationalisation; brand; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split ... vol1_no2_art_016.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol1-iss2-13-143
Access Statistics for this article
Global Economic Observer is currently edited by Serghei Margulescu and Simona Moagar-Poladian
More articles in Global Economic Observer from "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences Contact information at EDIRC., Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stefan Ciucu ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).