 EU FUNDED PROJECTS: MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR PREVENTING FRAUD. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES IN THE MEMBER STATESGlobal Economic Observer, 2014, vol. 2, issue 2, 178-185 Abstract: The purpose of our analysis is to contribute to fighting fraud detrimental to the European Union's financial interests by the dissemination of the knowledge in the field of administrative measures for preventing fraud and irregularities related to the EU Structural funds. In this study we present some theoretical issues as well as the results of a comparative analysis between member states which offer some answers to the question about how much fraud is committed in the EU Structural funds and who are the “champions” of fraud in the last years. Our analysis is structured on 4 parts: a) Romania and the European Funds b) Irregularities and fraud in the management of the EU projects; c) Management tools of Member States to prevent frauds in EU funds- a comparative analysis; d) Conclusions regarding Romanian administrative measures to better prevention of cases of suspected fraud. Keywords: European Funds; irregularities; preventing fraud; Management tools; administrative measures; EU; Romania (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol2-iss2-14-178 Access Statistics for this article Global Economic Observer is currently edited by Serghei Margulescu and Simona Moagar-Poladian More articles in Global Economic Observer from "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences Contact information at EDIRC., Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to econpapers@oru.se.
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.