Reassessing private practice in public hospitals in Ireland: An overview of OECD experiences
Michael Mueller and
Karolina Socha-Dietrich
Additional contact information
Michael Mueller: OECD
Karolina Socha-Dietrich: OECD
No 118, OECD Health Working Papers from OECD Publishing
Abstract:
In 2017, the “Sláintecare Report” proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the Irish health system including a reform proposal to phase out private practice in public hospitals to end the unequal treatment of public and private patients – private patients typically have quicker access to care – and reduce waiting times for public patients. This paper summarises the arguments for and against this practice that were put forward to help inform the subsequent policy debate. The paper compares how private practice is regulated and organised in Ireland with the situation in four other OECD countries – Australia, France, Israel and the United Kingdom - and discusses the costs and benefits of private practice in public hospitals, and highlights potential consequences of a ban on this practice. It also describes the information required when making a decision whether to ban this practice or not. Finally, the paper discusses some alternative policy approaches that could replace or complement a ban of private practice to discontinue the unequal treatment of public and private patients.
JEL-codes: I11 I13 J45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-05-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/111171d3-en (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:elsaad:118-en
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in OECD Health Working Papers from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().