The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co-operation
Anabela Correia de Brito,
Céline Kauffmann and
Jacques Pelkmans
Additional contact information
Anabela Correia de Brito: Centre for European Policy Studies
Céline Kauffmann: OECD
Jacques Pelkmans: Centre for European Policy Studies
No 2, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers from OECD Publishing
Abstract:
This study takes stock of the institutional setting, operational modalities, strengths and weaknesses of various forms of mutual recognition when used in different sector and country contexts. It aims to build a greater understanding of the benefits and pitfalls of one of the 11 mechanisms of international regulatory co-operation identified by the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee in OECD (2013), International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges. The paper relies on an empirical stocktaking of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) among selected OECD countries, the systematic review of mutual recognition clauses in trade agreements, case studies of the specific experience of the EU internal market, the Trans-Tasman arrangement, and the MRA between the US and the EU of 1998, and an extensive review of the literature.
Keywords: mutual recognition; regulatory policy; trade agreements (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 F5 H7 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-01-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm56fqsfxmx-en (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:govaah:2-en
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).