How is Quality of Life Measured for Health Technology Assessments?

Christopher Sampson

Briefing from Office of Health Economics

Abstract: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is the economic evaluation method that is typically preferred by health technology assessment agencies. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) – a composite measure of quality and quantity of life – are often used as the measure of benefit in a CEA. The quality of life component requires health state utilities, which are anchored at one (indicating full health) and zero (indicating being dead). This short report summarises the typical approach for obtaining utilities (i.e. through the use of generic preference-based measures such as EQ-5D). It then describes the potential limitations of this approach and outlines some alternatives such as: a) alternative generic preference-based measures; b) bolt-on questions for EQ-5D; c) condition-specific preference-based measures; and d) mapping to EQ-5D from condition-specific non-preference-based measures.

Keywords: Measuring; and; Valuing; Outcomes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-07-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ohe.org/publications/how-quality-life- ... asuring-qol-for-hta/ (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ohe:briefg:002357

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Briefing from Office of Health Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).