Death to the Cobb-Douglas Production Function? A Meta-Analysis of the Capital-Labor Substitution Elasticity
Tomas Havranek,
Zuzana Irsova,
Sebastian Gechert and
Dominika Kolcunová
No 6um5g, MetaArXiv from Center for Open Science
Abstract:
We show that the large elasticity of substitution between capital and labor estimated in the literature on average, 0.9, can be explained by three factors: publication bias, use of aggregated data, and omission of the first-order condition for capital. The mean elasticity conditional on the absence of publication bias, disaggregated data, and inclusion of information from the first-order condition for capital is 0.3. To obtain this result, we collect 3,186 estimates of the elasticity reported in 121 studies, codify 71 variables that reflect the context in which researchers produce their estimates, and address model uncertainty by Bayesian and frequentist model averaging. We employ nonlinear techniques to correct for publication bias, which is responsible for at least half of the overall reduction in the mean elasticity from 0.9 to 0.3. Our findings also suggest that a failure to normalize the production function leads to a substantial upward bias in the estimated elasticity. The weight of evidence accumulated in the empirical literature emphatically rejects the Cobb-Douglas specification.
Date: 2019-11-13
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5dcd4ce4360e17000aa19a26/
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:metaar:6um5g
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6um5g
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MetaArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF (contact@cos.io).