A Reply to Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke on the Discordant Outcomes of Hypothesis Testing

Daniel S Goldman

No qs5gm, MetaArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke, et al. attempted to test for uniformity in the way hypotheses were tested across multiple research groups. They appeared to find a great deal of discord between conclusions reached using the same hypothesis and data. Yet, what they really found is that scientists are not properly understanding what hypotheses are.

Date: 2021-10-14
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/616826acfd5b23026898a0b8/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:metaar:qs5gm

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qs5gm

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MetaArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().