Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting the peer reviewers for their contribution to science

Aron Gauti Laxdal and Tommy Haugen

No 7c5xr, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: • The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated. • While it’s unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted. • Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and increasing transparency throughout the process. • We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.

Date: 2023-09-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/650047a46d1e89584f15179c/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7c5xr

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7c5xr

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().