Quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in peer review and education
Hilde Elisabeth Maria Augusteijn,
Jelte M. Wicherts,
Klaas Sijtsma and
Marcel A. L. M. van Assen
Additional contact information
Hilde Elisabeth Maria Augusteijn: Tilburg University
Jelte M. Wicherts: Tilburg University
No 7dc6a, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Abstract:
We report a vignette study and a survey to investigate which study characteristics influence quality ratings academics give of articles submitted for publication, and academics and students give of students’ theses. In the vignette study, 800 respondents evaluated the quality of an abstract of studies with small or large sample sizes, showing statistically significant or non-significant results, and containing statistical reporting errors or no errors. In the survey, the same participants rated the importance of 29 manuscript characteristics related to the study’s theory, design, conduct, data analyses, and presentation for assessing either the quality of a manuscript or its publishability (article) or grade (thesis). Results showed that quality ratings were affected by sample sizes but not by statistical significance or the presence of statistical reporting errors in the rated research vignette. These results suggest that researchers’ assessments of manuscript quality are not responsible for publication bias. Furthermore, academics and students provided highly similar ratings of the importance of different aspects relevant to quality assessment of articles and theses. These results suggest that quality criteria for scientific manuscripts are already adopted by students and are similar for submitted manuscripts and theses.
Date: 2023-01-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/63b40dc2e48ccc08404fdc77/
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7dc6a
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7dc6a
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().