Ownership illusions: When ownership really matters for economic analysis

Cameron Murray and Tim Helm
Additional contact information
Cameron Murray: The University of Sydney
Tim Helm: Independent economic consultant

No cw8ze, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: A common unit of economic analysis is the firm. Firms are assumed to maximise profits, subject to the well-recognised caveat that incentives of owners and managers can differ. Less well recognised is how ownership structures themselves affect incentives, behaviour and economic outcomes. With the wrong assumptions about ownership and when it matters, economic analysis can misrepresent economic reality. Such situations we refer to as ownership illusions. We show how attention to ownership structures can change subsequent economic analysis through four examples of ownership illusions. In competition policy, the incentives of firms are blurred by cross-ownership, leading to questions around the validity of default models and exactly how the incentive-driven process of competition is to be understood. When assessing the economic performance of privately or government owned businesses, the capital value of ownership is often ignored when in public ownership but is a primary metric of success when in private ownership. Retirement income systems reliant on individual ownership of financial assets are often inaccurately described as “pre-funded”, by way of contrast with pay-as-you-go or “unfunded” public pensions, regardless of differences in underlying capacity to support cashflows but simply because there exist no priced ownership rights for future pensions. In housing policy, the idea that competition between landowners can push down land prices reflects incentives from product market models where ownership dispersion matters, not those from the “location franchise” model of monopoly that land involves in reality. Identifying this class of problems in economic reasoning can help refine our economic understanding and foster more consistency in future analysis.

Date: 2022-11-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/637af513610dd51c9df5c579/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cw8ze

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cw8ze

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().