Pricing upzoning: A reply to critics

Cameron Murray and Josh Gordon
Additional contact information
Cameron Murray: The University of Sydney

No d3mt6, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: We thank the four respondents to our article, who have provided a range of insights into the debate around upzoning. To organize this reply, we first restate our main arguments below, and then summarize our responses to the main criticisms advanced by the four respondents. In our article, we made the following arguments: a) Upzoning provides additional property rights to current property owners, akin to providing them with “airspace” rights. b) These rights have a market value that could be priced. c) Unpriced upzoning has a budgetary cost due to this foregone revenue. d) The initial allocation of residential property rights in most countries is highly unequal, and thus unpriced upzoning will accrue to current property owners, exacerbating inequality. e) The alleged housing benefits from upzoning rely primarily on the idea that it will significantly increase the rate of supply, and thereby lower house prices and rents for non-owners. However, this claim is questionable, and existing evidence suggests it will not occur. f) There are many effective policies to price upzoning or otherwise achieve public benefit from upzoning, and these should be undertaken. The respondents agreed with many main points. For example, there was broad agreement that the value of upzoning rights can be large and that this represents an opportunity to generate public value. All the respondents also recognized that policies exist that are feasible to capture this value, even if there is disagreement on which, if any, should be adopted.

Date: 2023-10-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/651f4f5c5b185600247a9f60/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d3mt6

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d3mt6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().