The Ethics of Field Experiments in Authoritarian Contexts: A Comment on Cantoni, Yang, Yuchtman and Zhang (2019)

Michelangelo Geovanny Landgrave
Additional contact information
Michelangelo Geovanny Landgrave: Princeton University

No nvzt8, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: This article is a comment on Cantoni et al. (2019) and subsequent research conducted as part of the “Demand for Democracy” project. In the aforementioned article, researchers report a field experiment where Hong Kong research subjects are nudged to participate in a protest against the People’s Republic of China using an informational treatment. I argue that the field experiment is unethical because, in addition to being deceptive, it was conducted in an authoritarian context where research subjects can be punished for protesting and because research subjects have no practical recourse for any harm suffered as part of the experiment. The Demand for Democracy experiment is not only unethical, but is illustrative of a larger systemic problem with conducting experiments in authoritarian contexts. I propose that field experiments in authoritarian contexts be banned, or that the experimental community should at minimum adopt safeguards to protect research subjects.

Date: 2023-05-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/645cf2b160fc5d0f82ca1bfa/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:nvzt8

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/nvzt8

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().