Bard evaluates US climate bill

Ai Bard

No q7an9, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Whether the bill is rational depends on your perspective. Some people believe that the bill is a rational response to the climate crisis, while others believe that it is not going far enough. The bill is rational in the sense that it is a significant step in the right direction. It includes funding for a variety of climate initiatives, such as clean energy research and development, energy efficiency programs, and climate adaptation efforts. These initiatives will help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change. However, some people believe that the bill is not rational because it does not go far enough. They argue that the US needs to do more to reduce its emissions and invest in climate adaptation measures. They also argue that the bill is not ambitious enough, and that it does not do enough to address the climate crisis. Ultimately, whether the bill is rational is a matter of opinion. There are valid arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

Date: 2023-05-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-mfd
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/646cdeb2eade8106856620ef/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:q7an9

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/q7an9

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().