Estimating value-added returns to labor training programs with causal machine learning

Mintaka Angell, Samantha Gold, Justine Hastings, Mark Howison, Scott Jensen, Niall Keleher, Daniel Molitor and Amelia Roberts

No thg23, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Technology may displace tens of millions of workers in the coming decades. Part of the explanation for the projected displacement is an expanding mismatch in skills that employers seek and the skills that workers possess. Effects of labor force displacement disproportionately affect low-income workers and workers within industries where technological change replaces labor. As a result, a great deal of emphasis is placed on training and reskilling workers to ease transitions into new careers. However, utilization of training programs may be below optimal levels if workers are uncertain about the returns to their investment in training. While the U.S. spends billions of dollars annually on reskilling programs and unemployment insurance, there are few measures of program effectiveness that workers and government can use to guide training investment decisions and ensure delivery of valuable reskilling and improved outcomes. In a nationwide conjoint survey experiment, we find job seekers prefer information on the value-added returns to earnings following enrollment in training and reskilling programs. We identify a clear demand for value-added measures. For every 10% increase in expected earnings, workers are 17.4% more likely to express interest in a training program. To meet this demand for information, governments can provide return on investment measures. Fortunately, the data to estimate these returns are available in state administrative data. We demonstrate a causal machine learning method that provides these missing causal estimates of value-added that workers prefer and that can provide correct incentives in the market for labor training. Focusing on a set of workforce training programs in Rhode Island, our causal machine learning estimates suggest that training increases enrollees’ future quarterly earnings by \$605. We estimate that return on investment ranges between -\$1,570 in quarterly earnings for the lowest value-added program to \$3,470 in quarterly earnings for the highest value-added program.

Date: 2021-09-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big, nep-cmp and nep-ias
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/614e31a8ed4cbe0047dca2f1/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:thg23

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/thg23

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF (contact@cos.io).