A trade-off from the future: How risk aversion may explain the demand for illiquid assets

Eduardo Ferraz Castelo Branco Ferreira and César Mantilla

No xbsn8, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: We use a three-period model adopting a recursive definition of consumption to explore the optimal delegation that a present self, aware that her near-future self is present-biased but better informed, will make to protect her far-future self against income shocks. The model captures the present self's trade-off between using commitment mechanisms, restricting the near-future self's agency through illiquid savings, and profiting from the near-future self's better information about future shocks. Our main result states that agents with higher risk aversion can cover better against utility losses from time-inconsistent consumption through the commitment mechanism. Given the evidence of women being more risk-averse than men, this result provides the micro-foundation for the gender gap in adopting financial commitment devices, especially among single individuals.

Date: 2022-09-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/631d11c88facb0362a622eab/

Related works:
Working Paper: A trade-off from the future: How risk aversion may explain the demand for illiquid assets (2022)
Working Paper: A trade-off from the future: How risk aversion may explain the demand for illiquid assets (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:xbsn8

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/xbsn8

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().