The Vacuity of Ludwig von Mises’ Apriorism

Scott Scheall

No 3aqcj, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Ludwig von Mises’ methodological apriorism is often attributed to the broader Austrian School of economics. However, there is considerable controversy concerning the meaning of Mises’ justification of his apriorism. There are inconsistencies within and across Mises’ methodological writings that engender confusion in the secondary literature. This confusion is aggravated by the fact that Mises’ apriorism cannot be interpreted as an artifact of his historical milieu. The two prevailing families of interpretation both treat Mises’ apriorism as anachronistic, albeit in divergent senses. I conclude that the primary and secondary literatures on Mises’ apriorism indicate its inconsistency and incoherence. We have no idea what justification Mises intended when he asserted the a priori nature of the fundamental propositions of economics. If this is right, then, whatever method(s) they follow, Austrian economists cannot (deliberately) follow Mises’ apriorism, because no one knows well enough how Mises meant to justify it to follow it purposefully.

Date: 2024-04-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hme and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/661690bce65c6048a47d9e11/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:3aqcj

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3aqcj

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().