Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Colin Camerer (), Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck Ho (), Juergen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek and Thomas Pfeiffer
Additional contact information
Felix Holzmeister: University of Innsbruck
Brian A. Nosek: University of Virginia
Thomas Pfeiffer: Massey University Auckland

No 4hmb6, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Being able to replicate scientific findings is crucial for scientific progress. We replicate 21 systematically selected experimental studies in the social sciences published in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. The replications follow analysis plans reviewed by the original authors and pre-registered prior to the replications. The replications are high powered, with sample sizes on average about five times higher than in the original studies. We find a significant effect in the same direction as the original study for 13 (62%) studies, and the effect size of the replications is on average about 50% of the original effect size. Replicability varies between 12 (57%) and 14 (67%) studies for complementary replicability indicators. Consistent with these results, the estimated true positive rate is 67% in a Bayesian analysis. The relative effect size of true positives is estimated to be 71%, suggesting that both false positives and inflated effect sizes of true positives contribute to imperfect reproducibility. Furthermore, we find that peer beliefs of replicability are strongly related to replicability, suggesting that the research community could predict which results would replicate and that failures to replicate were not the result of chance alone.

Date: 2018-08-27
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (115)

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5b7ef2af8c6d9f001baeb8b3/

Related works:
Journal Article: Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)
Working Paper: Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)
Working Paper: Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:4hmb6

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4hmb6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().