Institutional contradictions and opportunities: How marginalized women farmers engage in bottom-up institution-building

Luca Castellanza

No ekr2p, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: How can marginalized individuals alter institutional schemas that propel discrimination, unfairness and injustice? From an Embedded Agency perspective, marginalized actors are inherently motivated to oppose dominant prejudices, but lack power and resources to instigate change. Yet, based on institutional micro-foundations, we posit that even marginalized individuals can be considered legitimate change agents for specific institutional practices. Through an ethnography of 76 discriminated women farmers in South-West Cameroon, this article shows the processes through which marginalized individuals can build inclusive institutions regardless of their peripheral position within the societal hierarchy. We find that the institutionalized practices of farmers’ and women’s discrimination differ in their ease of alterability and introduce ‘acceptable deviance’, the contextualized possibility to change an institution depending on the individual’s situational legitimacy and the community’s openness to accept changes in that institution. These insights contribute to the discussions of opportunities in institutional entrepreneurship and bottom-up solutions to grand challenges.

Date: 2019-01-23
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5c478e3d154ce50018dffe62/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:ekr2p

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ekr2p

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().