Public Pressure or Peer Influence: What Shapes Police Executives' Views on Civilian Oversight?

Ian T. Adams, Joshua McCrain, Daniel S. Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff and Scott M. Mourtgos
Additional contact information
Ian T. Adams: University of South Carolina
Daniel S. Schiff: Purdue University
Kaylyn Jackson Schiff: Emory University

No mdu96, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Demand for democratic accountability in policing is accelerating, yet little is understood about how law enforcement executives engage in policy learning around civilian oversight. This paper shares the results of a novel survey experiment administered to all U.S. police chiefs and sheriffs. We assess whether police executives’ attitudes towards civilian oversight are responsive to 1) state-level public opinion (drawing on an n=16,840 survey) and 2) prior adoption of civilian review boards in large agencies. Results from over 1,300 police executives reveal that law enforcement leaders are responsive to peer adoption but much less to public opinion, despite overwhelming support amongst voters. Further, we find that agencies with an established oversight board are highly supportive of their existence, while elected sheriffs are much less likely to support civilian oversight. Our results indicate that policy learning and reform around civilian oversight are possible, though sources of reform are not themselves primarily democratic.

Date: 2022-09-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6319e6c609a8522635d9f5a6/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:mdu96

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mdu96

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().