Attitudes to long-term care in India

Sweedal Alberts, Abinaya Nadarajah, Claudia Cooper, Bianca Brijnath, Santosh Loganathan, Matthew Varghese, Josefine Antoniades, Upasana Baruah, Briony Dow and Mike Kent

No mq5sz, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Objectives: In India, globalisation is purported to have contributed to shifting family structures and changing attitudes to long-term care (LTC) facility use. We investigated the usage frequency and attitudes to LTC in India. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of: (a) The LASI (Longitudinal Ageing Study in India) 2017-18 cross-sectional survey of a randomised probability sample of Indian adults aged 45+ living in private households; and (b) Moving Pictures India Project qualitative interviews with 19 carers for people with dementia and 25 professionals, collected in 2022, exploring attitudes to LTC. Results: Of 73,396 LASI participants, 40 were considering moving to LTC; 18,281 had a parent alive, of whom 9 reported that their father, and 16 that their mother, was living in LTC. Whilst rare overall, LTC use and consideration of use were more likely to be in urban areas, in middle-richest income quintiles with higher levels of education, and for those who were more likely to rate their health as good or very good. We identified three themes from qualitative data: 1. LTC as a last resort, describes how LTC could be acceptable if care at home was “impossible” due to the person’s medical condition or unavailability of the family carer, for example if they lived abroad. 2. Social expectations of care at home from family members and paid carers and; 3. Limited availability of LTC facilities in India, especially in rural localities, and the financial barriers to their use. Conclusions: Preference for intergenerational community care, limited availability and societal stigma contribute to low rates of LTC use among Indian families. Future social policies should consider how to plan for greater equity in strengthening care at home, supporting care in the community, and bolstering respite and LTC services when other options are not available.

Date: 2023-08-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age and nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/64ef06d5d93e5126003986a0/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:mq5sz

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mq5sz

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().