The Power of Conformity in Citizens’ Blame: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Martin Sievert, Dominik Vogel, Tim Reinders and Waqar Ahmed
Additional contact information
Martin Sievert: University of Mannheim
Dominik Vogel: University of Hamburg

No qbjsh, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: The authors examine whether conformity towards prevailing public opinions and pre-existing blame influences citizens’ attribution of blame for public service failure, by using a between-group experimental design with five groups. Two groups received information cues mentioning different public opinions. Two additional groups received information on pre-existing blame or the absence of such blame. One control group did not receive any information. The empirical analysis reveals that public opinion in favor of blame leads to increased blame attribution, while a contrary public opinion decreases citizens’ blame. Likewise, the expected increase in citizens’ blame resulting from pre-existing blame is supported. However, the absence of blame has no effect. Overall, the experiment supports the impact of conformity on citizens' blame. In addition, the literature on citizens’ blame is extended by utilizing a citizen-centered perspective and taking social psychological theory into account.

Date: 2019-09-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/609c2843ca8a5f000d6796de/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:qbjsh

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qbjsh

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().