Explaining the political gridlock behind international Circular Economy: Chinese and European perspectives on the Waste Ban

Anran Luo, Fabricio Rodríguez and Sina Leipold

No uyw5g, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: China and the EU recently established an agreement to develop a Circular Economy (CE), a (re)emerging socio-economic framework to address growing challenges of global environmental change. Up to now, there is limited research addressing the implications of a joint CE framework following the China-EU agreement. Based on 72 expert interviews, 52 documents and participant observation, we study political narratives around the Chinese Waste Ban (WB) to understand China and EU’s visions for a global CE. Our results reveal a political gridlock in China-EU coordination regarding the WB as the two political actors are not yet synchronized regarding their waste management visions and are mentally unprepared to cooperate on international CE development. Both rely on old development and trade discourses, have diverging CE visions and conflicting perceptions of their respective waste governance roles, as well as prioritize differing scales for international CE development. Based on these results, we suggest CE stakeholders to reevaluate the EU and China’s mutual narratives and related agencies. Most importantly, we argue that decision-makers need to reimagine their roles beyond a linear development model, and to focus on waste prevention instead of waste diversion.

Date: 2020-11-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5faa445c91419d019866d9b6/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:uyw5g

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/uyw5g

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().