EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to Kill a BIT and not Die Trying: Legal and Political Challenges of Denouncing or Renegotiating Bilateral Investment Treaties

Federico M. Lavopa, Lucas E. Barreiros and M. Victoria Bruno

Journal of International Economic Law, 2013, vol. 16, issue 4, 869-891

Abstract: Arbitral tribunals' expansive interpretation of key disciplines in international investment law in recent years has prompted a number of developing countries to implement strategies aimed at exiting the system. These range from denouncing the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States ("ICSID Convention") and withdrawing consent to jurisdiction by other arbitral bodies, to denouncing the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) to which they are parties. The purported objective of these initiatives is to reduce the legal exposure of these countries to international claims before arbitral tribunals, either by eliminating a forum for foreign investors' claims or by cancelling their rights under the treaties. Whether any of these strategies will be successful in meeting this goal is still hard to say, as both the ICSID Convention and BITs have 'immune systems'--i.e. a set of built-in self-defense mechanisms--that render them somewhat resilient to change or termination. After assessing pros and cons of each of these three 'exit strategies', this article argues that developing States seeking to reduce the possible negative effects of international investment arbitration, would be better off by renegotiating their BITs. Renegotiation does not require the termination of the treaty, it may be implemented at any time and does not trigger the application of 'survival clauses', thus making changes to the BIT immediately applicable. The article thus concludes that, paradoxically, the most rational way for countries seeking to exit the system seems to be to stay in it. The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgt025 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:16:y:2013:i:4:p:869-891

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economic Law is currently edited by Kathleen Claussen, Sergio Puig and Michael Waibel

More articles in Journal of International Economic Law from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:16:y:2013:i:4:p:869-891