Fractured, Fragmented Federalism: A Study in Fracking Regulatory Policy
Barbara Warner and
Jennifer Shapiro
Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2013, vol. 43, issue 3, 474-496
Abstract:
Unlike the regulation of other heavy industries, fracking--in which companies create cracks in shale rock to extract gas, oil, or other substances--has been exempted from federal reach, leaving regulation to the states, which appear vulnerable to capture by energy interests. As fracking has expanded, become more complex, and generated considerable controversy, some states have sought to quash local government efforts to impose more stringent regulations. Citizens and activists have sought redress through the courts, and some states are fighting over the transport of waste disposal across state lines. The story is one of fractured, fragmented federalism that illustrates the key role played by regulated interests that prefer state to federal regulation, resulting in a variable, often weak state regulatory regime. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjt014 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:43:y:2013:i:3:p:474-496
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco
More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press (joanna.bergh@oup.com).