EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Institutional Investors and Hedge Fund Activism

Simi Kedia, Laura T. Starks and Xianjue Wang

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-43

Abstract: Hedge fund activists have ambiguous relationships with the institutional shareholders in their target firms. While some support their activities, others counter their actions. Due to their relatively small holdings in target firms, activists typically need the cooperation of other institutional shareholders that are willing to influence the activists’ campaign success. We find the presence of “activism-friendly” institutions as owners is associated with an increased probability of being a target, higher long-term stock returns, and higher operating performance. Overall, we provide evidence suggesting the composition of a firm’s ownership has significant effects on hedge fund activists’ decisions and outcomes. (JEL: G13, G23, G34)Received March 12, 2020; editorial decision July 13, 2020 by Editor Andrew Ellul. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa027 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:1-43.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies is currently edited by Andrew Ellul

More articles in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:1-43.