Proxy Advisory Firms, Governance, Market Failure, and Regulation

Chester S. Spatt

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, 136-157

Abstract: Proxy advisory firms developed due to market failures underlying voting and corporate governance more broadly. However, these firms, which have not been subject to mandatory regulation, reflect their own market failures, emphasizing challenges underlying corporate governance. We highlight underlying frictions, such as economies of scale and public goods aspects to information production, the import of incentive conflicts faced by the advisory firms, their power, and the implications of their recommendations and votes by different types of investors. Asset managers emphasizing stewardship are more supportive of management than are proxy advisors. We highlight the evolving regulatory environment and limitations of one-size-fits-all recommendations. (JEL G34, G38, G24, H4)Received October 31, 2019; editorial decision October 17, 2020 by Editor Andrew Ellul.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa026 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:136-157.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies is currently edited by Andrew Ellul

More articles in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().