The Implementation of the BRRD in Italy and its First Test: Policy Implications

Lorenzo Stanghellini

Journal of Financial Regulation, 2016, vol. 2, issue 1, 154-161

Abstract: Eleven months after the deadline, in November 2015, Italy implemented the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. The detailed structure of the Directive drove most of the choices, but the Italian implementing acts are overall clearer than the Directive, especially in outlining the sequence of decisions that the competent authorities and the resolution authorities have to take with respect to a bank that is failing or likely to fail. Less than a week after their enactment, the new rules were applied to resolve four regional banks that until then had been under temporary administration. Although the resolution has been carried swiftly and in accordance with the principles of the Directive, this apparently minor case shows two lessons: that almost all banking crises will be handled with the new rules, liquidation being confined to micro-banks, and that the practical challenges of resolution actions are enormous.

Keywords: banks; BRRD; Italy; resolution; bail-in; recovery (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jfr/fjw005 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:refreg:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:154-161.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Regulation is currently edited by Dan Awrey, Geneviève Helleringer and Wolf-Georg Ringe

More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().