Testing The Core-competency Model of Multi-Product Exporters
Beata Javorcik,
J. Peter Neary,
Carsten Eckel and
Leonardo Iacovone
No 768, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Abstract: We review the implications of the "core competence" model of multi-product firms, including the “market-size paradox”: for most countries, the world market is much larger than the home market, while the costs of accessing foreign markets are relatively low; hence the model predicts that most domestic firms should export more of their core products than they sell domestically; yet, in practice, we do not observe this. Extending the model to allow for investment in export market penetration resolves the puzzle, and Mexican data confirm its predictions: in particular,only the largest firms exhibit the dominance of exports over home sales.
Keywords: Core competence model; Export market penetration costs; Flexible manufacturing; Multi-product firms. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-12-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:eb5bb141-7b83-4a75-a40d-9897e804ba38 (text/html)
Related works:
Journal Article: Testing the Core-competency Model of Multi-product Exporters (2016) 
Working Paper: Testing The Core-Competency Model Of Multi-Product Exporters (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:768
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen (facultyadmin@economics.ox.ac.uk this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).