EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Prospect theory and risk-taking behavior: an empirical investigation of Islamic and conventional banks

Yousra Trichilli (), Hana Kharrat () and Mouna Boujelbène Abbes ()
Additional contact information
Yousra Trichilli: Sfax University
Hana Kharrat: Sfax University
Mouna Boujelbène Abbes: Sfax University

Journal of Asset Management, 2021, vol. 22, issue 3, No 2, 163-178

Abstract: Abstract The paper aims to explain the risk taking in Islamic and conventional banks from a behavioral prospect as proposed by Kahneman and Tversky (1979) and Tversky and Kahneman (1992). We used the thermal optimal path (TOP) method to test the prospect theory predictions on a sample of 128 Islamic and conventional banks operating in 13 Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries. We found significant correlation coefficients for each measure of the returns, except with the IINTL measure for conventional banks, which is situated below the target and the ROE measure for Islamic banks, which is situated below the target and conventional banks, which is located above the target. Indeed, in the areas of a loss below the target level, the correlation coefficient results are positive for the ROE, ROA and IINTL measures for both Islamic and conventional banks, suggesting an excessive risk-taking behavior. Furthermore, empirical results revealed that unlike the return measures, all the other measures, except the EQTA measure for conventional banks situated above the target, are significant. The results also indicated that for the areas below the benchmark, positive correlation coefficients are obtained for all the risk measures for conventional and Islamic banks except for the LLPTL measure. In fact, these results have several implications for policymakers and banks’ regulators who better supervise the banking system. Moreover, these results show how bank managers behave facing the risk.

Keywords: Islamic banks; Risk; Thermal optimal path method; Prospect theory; Behavioral biases; Loss aversion bias; Mental accounting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41260-021-00222-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:22:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1057_s41260-021-00222-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41260

DOI: 10.1057/s41260-021-00222-4

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Asset Management is currently edited by Marielle de Jong and Dan diBartolomeo

More articles in Journal of Asset Management from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:22:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1057_s41260-021-00222-4